Case study
Mary
survived a car crash which killed her
husband. She was hospitalised for several
months.
Her
husband, John did not leave a will. She
had to go through all his documents to
determine whether he had left a will and
then to piece together what were the
assets and liabilities of Johns
estate.
She
took two years to get the letters of
administration for Johns estate.
Under
the Interstate Succession Act, she
inherited half the estate. The other half
went to her two children who were two and
five years old.
The
law required another adult to be
appointed as a co-administrator to hold
the children's property in trust until
they were 21 years old.
At
first, her brother-in-law was appointed.
Later on, he declined to act and Mary had
to persuade a sister-in-law to become the
co-administrator.
If
John had left a Will, Mary would have
been able to access Johns assets
quicker and obtain the much needed money
for her medical and household expenses.
.
|
When
must I make a Will?
(1) If
you are already 21 years old, you should make a
Will. If you make a Will, your assets will be
managed and distributed in accordance with your
wishes in the event that you die. Without a Will,
your assets may be distributed to persons to whom
you do not intend to give anything.
(2) Another advantage of
making a Will is that you can select your good
friends or relatives to manage and distribute
your assets. Without a Will, you have no control
on the choice of people who will look after your
assets.
Do I
need a lawyer to prepare a Will?
You may make your own Will
but if your Will is ineffective or invalid, you
will not be around anymore to correct it. Your
assets may not be distributed in the manner you
have desired and your loved ones may suffer as a
result. There are certain technicalities that may
render a Will invalid.
Example:
The signing of your Will
must be witnessed by two persons who are not
beneficiaries under the Will and who are not
the husband or wife of any of the
beneficiaries.
How
much will it cost to engage a lawyer to prepare
my Will?
A simple Will can cost as
little as $250.00.
Should
I tell anyone of my Will?
It is important that your
loved ones who will benefit under your Will and
the persons you have selected to look after your
assets should know that you have made a Will and
where it is kept.
Can I
change or cancel my Will?
A Will can be changed or
cancelled by you at any time prior to your death.
You should consult a lawyer to ensure that the
changes or cancellation are carried out properly.
If you or remarry, your Will is cancelled
automatically and you should make a new Will.
marry
What
can I include in my Will?
In a Will, you may (when you
die) give away your house, car, shares, insurance
policies, money in bank accounts, cash and
jewellery to family members, friends and to
charitable and religious organisations. However,
you must to make reasonable provisions in your
Will for your wife and dependent children.
Estate
duty
Estate duty is payable on
all real estate situated within Singapore and
movable property (cash in hand, money in banks,
shares, cars, jewellery etc). Gifts made by the
deceased less than five years before death are
also dutiable. The rates of estate duty are as
follows:
For movable assets, the
first $600,000 including contributions to CPF (up
to the compulsory rate of contributions) are
exempt.
For residential properties,
the first $9 million is exempt for an aggregate
of properties.
Where estate duty is
chargeable, the duty for the first $12 million is
at 5% .
Above $12 million, the duty
is at 10%.
What
about my money in the Central Provident Fund?
If you have nominated
someone to receive your money in the CPF, it will
be distributed to that person regardless of what
you may have stated in your Will. Your nomination
will be cancelled automatically if you get
married and you should make a fresh nomination.
This does not include CPF money used to purchase
property or shares. These will be distributed
under your Will.
Do
you want to know more about planning for the future?
If so, read
on
Insurance
- Nominated beneficiaries
It is a common
practice when buying an insurance to nominate a
beneficiary at the time of taking out a policy. You
think the person nominated would receive the proceeds
of the policy on your death.
Legally, it is
not so straightforward.
In contract, A
promise to pay insurance company "B" a
premium and B agrees to pay C on A's death. There is
a good contract between A and B. But C is not a party
to the contract and he cannot sue.
The insurance
company and personal representative may take the view
that the policy money forms part of the estate of the
assured. There appears to be no law that requires the
personal representative to pay the policy money to
the nominated beneficiary. The ownership of the
policy can pass to the personal representative of A
and becomes part of the estate of A.
In order to
avoid the uncertainties and difficulties relating to
the effectiveness of nominations under the policy,
one should use a will to direct how payment from
insurance should be distributed.
Section 73
of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act
A policy of
assurance affected by a man on his life and expressed
to be for the benefit of his wife and/or children
shall create a trust in favour of his family and the
moneys payable shall not form part of the estate.
The effect of
such an insurance policy is:
(a) to create a
trust of the life policies in favour of the spouse
and/or children;
(b) to give
special protection against creditors;
(c) to provide
estate duty savings.
In Re Choong
Chak Choon (1937), the husband bought an insurance
policy on his life. The beneficiaries were stated as
his wife and two of his sons. A clause in the policy
allowed the insured to replace the beneficiaries at
any time. On his death, he left a will whereby he
bequeathed all his real and personal estate to his
trustee for certain specified purposes. The court
held that the presence of the revocation clause did
not prevent the interest in the policy from vesting
in the wife and sons.
If you name a
wife and children and she dies. Can you insert your
new wife and her children? The answer appears to be
no.
In the case
of Jones v McNeil (1899), the husband took out a
policy on his life for the benefit of his wife and
children. His wife died and the husband deleted her
name and inserted the name of his new wife. On his
death, the husband was survived by his new wife and
eight children. It was held that the insertion of the
new wife was a nullity.
If the policy
falls within the statute, the wife and children have
an immediate interest in the policy. It cannot be
surrendered for cash value etc without their consent.
The money
payable under the policy shall not (so long as any
object of the trust remains unperformed) form part of
the estate of the husband.
What if all the
beneficiaries die before the husband?
In the case
of Cousins v Sun Life Assurance Society (1933), the
Court held that a trust for the beneficiary's estate
was created even though the beneficiary had died.
Recently, the
Singapore Court ruled that a woman should be given
the full amount from her ex-husband's insurance even
though they were divorced two years before his death.
Converting
an existing policy to a policy falling within the
statute
If the assured
had not named his wife and children as beneficiaries
when he took out a policy on his life, can he
subsequently insert his wife and children?
The courts have
traditionally been inclined to give a wide and
liberal interpretation to allow the wife and children
to benefit from a policy. As such, they have
interpreted the Act to include endowment policies or
policies that only give a contingent interest.
In Kishabai
v Jaikishan (1981), the husband took out a policy on
his life in 1970 for the benefit of his nephew. In
1974, the husband purportedly cancel his nephew's
name and inserted his daughter. The Court held that
the policy was valid.
Raffleslaw.com
Email raffleslaw@yahoo.com raffleslaw@hotmail.com
|